Started By
Message
re: Bama didn't win the conference in 2011,
Posted on 12/7/14 at 7:52 am to greygotigers
Posted on 12/7/14 at 7:52 am to greygotigers
Bama should not have gotten a mulligan, they lost at home. OSU should not have lost to Iowa State. But the mulligan game helped us get this 4 team playoff which is much more fair and does not screw the third ranked team.
Oregon would have been screwed and Bama would have only had to BEAT FSU under the old system.
Oregon would have been screwed and Bama would have only had to BEAT FSU under the old system.
2
Posted on 12/7/14 at 8:50 am to allin2010
quote:
Bama should not have gotten a mulligan, they lost at home.
And Arizona beat Oregon AT Oregon earlier this year. Should they have had to play them again in order to win their championship? Get over it. The goal of BCS was to put the two best teams against one another for the title. In 2011, the two best teams were clearly Bama and Lsu. Not either of their fault that they come from same division of same conference.
It's over. Record books will forever show Bama as champs in 2011, despite constant and continuous whining from LSU fans trying to justify that embarrassment on 1/9 and some AU fans (like you) trying to do anything they can to diminish the accomplishments of their cross state rival. Let. It. Go.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 10:42 am to allin2010
quote:
OSU should not have lost to Iowa State.
So you would have been OK with giving OSU a mulligan? Barner and LSU logic.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News