Started By
Message
re: Was Big 12 football better than the SEC?
Posted on 12/5/14 at 10:44 am to GAT BoilerPickle Doc
Posted on 12/5/14 at 10:44 am to GAT BoilerPickle Doc
Please stop making me laugh!
Mizzou today and for the last 3 years has absolutely no reflection on our former conference. I did not see the BIG 12-2+2-2 jumping in to claim Mizzou during our first year in the SEC or after a loss to Indiana this year. Mizzou made the move for one reason and that was for equal treatment and opportunity, something that was sorely lacking in our conference. Four teams left, and Mizzou was the 3rd founding member to do so. But somehow being the last to leave made Mizzou the bad guy in the eyes of many. Go figure.
Five different SEC teams have won the NC in recent years, that is a little more depth than top heavy.
Mizzou today and for the last 3 years has absolutely no reflection on our former conference. I did not see the BIG 12-2+2-2 jumping in to claim Mizzou during our first year in the SEC or after a loss to Indiana this year. Mizzou made the move for one reason and that was for equal treatment and opportunity, something that was sorely lacking in our conference. Four teams left, and Mizzou was the 3rd founding member to do so. But somehow being the last to leave made Mizzou the bad guy in the eyes of many. Go figure.
Five different SEC teams have won the NC in recent years, that is a little more depth than top heavy.
1
Posted on 12/5/14 at 11:22 am to Bogie00
Both conferences got better because of this move:
(TCU + WVU) > (A&M + MU)
(TCU + WVU) > (A&M + MU)
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News