Started By
Message

re: Catholic couple fined $13,000 for refusing to host same-sex ‘wedding’

Posted on 11/11/14 at 6:12 pm to
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29194 posts
Posted on 11/11/14 at 6:12 pm to
quote:

I've maintained that private property rights are relevant,


So have I. I have also stated that private property rights don't always extend to public commerce, something you've refused to acknowledge.

quote:

you've argued that they aren't if someone's feelings are hurt


Never once have I mentioned someone's feelings.

quote:

A person cannot choose to be black, a person can choose to get married


Are you completely missing what's happening here? What if the person refused to let them rent the property for marriage because they were black? Would you tell that black person they can choose to get married someone else? That used to happen you know. People thought interracial marriage was against God's will.

quote:

What is so hard to understand?


Nothing on my end, but you seem to be completely missing everything. You can be discriminated against for being black. You can be discriminated against for being gay. Do you not agree with either of those sentences? Or are you just trying to ignore addressing anything I'm saying directly? I seriously have no idea at this point.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111801 posts
Posted on 11/11/14 at 6:14 pm to
quote:

Would you tell that black person they can choose to get married someone else? That used to happen you know. People thought interracial marriage was against God's will.


Why would you want a racist to perform your wedding if you're black? Why do we need people to be forced to agree with us?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter