Started By
Message
re: Catholic couple fined $13,000 for refusing to host same-sex ‘wedding’
Posted on 11/11/14 at 6:12 pm to Vols&Shaft83
Posted on 11/11/14 at 6:12 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
I've maintained that private property rights are relevant,
So have I. I have also stated that private property rights don't always extend to public commerce, something you've refused to acknowledge.
quote:
you've argued that they aren't if someone's feelings are hurt
Never once have I mentioned someone's feelings.
quote:
A person cannot choose to be black, a person can choose to get married
Are you completely missing what's happening here? What if the person refused to let them rent the property for marriage because they were black? Would you tell that black person they can choose to get married someone else? That used to happen you know. People thought interracial marriage was against God's will.
quote:
What is so hard to understand?
Nothing on my end, but you seem to be completely missing everything. You can be discriminated against for being black. You can be discriminated against for being gay. Do you not agree with either of those sentences? Or are you just trying to ignore addressing anything I'm saying directly? I seriously have no idea at this point.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 6:14 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
Would you tell that black person they can choose to get married someone else? That used to happen you know. People thought interracial marriage was against God's will.
Why would you want a racist to perform your wedding if you're black? Why do we need people to be forced to agree with us?
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News