Started By
Message
3
Posted on 11/4/14 at 6:11 am to geauxnavybeatbama
quote:Anybody who watched that play and thinks it was a horsecollar is a fricking moron. Grabbing somebody in the middle or lower part of their back does not come close to being a horsecollar
I thought the injury was related more to the horse collar and the targeting finishing move. Maybe the sec should fine for that instead
Posted on 11/4/14 at 7:50 am to geauxnavybeatbama
quote:
horse collar
His hands were no where near the collar.
quote:
the targeting finishing move
The defender that came across to hit him might have grazed him. Might. Also by the time that guy got over there, his ankle was already broken.
This post was edited on 11/4/14 at 7:53 am
Posted on 11/4/14 at 9:21 am to geauxnavybeatbama
quote:There was no horse collar. However, the grabbing of the jersey in the middle of the back (perfectly legal) resulted in the same type tackle that is the exact reason why the horse collar rule was instituted. It was an unfortunate occurrence but you can't make everything illegal or it would be flag football. I don't see where the playing surface had anything to do with it.
I thought the injury was related more to the horse collar and the targeting finishing move.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News