Started By
Message
re: Why can't part of the equation be Conference Champion
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:02 pm to CheeseburgerEddie
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:02 pm to CheeseburgerEddie
quote:
I'm not really concerned with the argument anymore. I am curious as to who won the 2011 national title in your eyes though
You do realize that there is no ncaa fbs national title holder , right? Thats why they're call Mythical National Championships. There are NCAA FBS national title games because there is a set criteria before the season giving specific ways to make the postseason playoffs. There isn't in ncaa fbs. You get voted in. Its subjective. Bama win the BCS bowl in 2011. Lsu won the sec. You know the titlen you can't eyeball test your way into?
This post was edited on 10/29/14 at 11:06 pm
1
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:06 pm to JaxTiger10
Did you know that in the SEC tie breaker there was a clause where a three way tie between three 11-1 teams would come down to their BCS rankings?
Hypocrite
How do you objectively choose the best sec west team if they are all 7-1 with a loss to each other? No eyeball tests...
Hypocrite
How do you objectively choose the best sec west team if they are all 7-1 with a loss to each other? No eyeball tests...
This post was edited on 10/29/14 at 11:07 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News