Started By
Message
re: Is there a fanbase trying to will themselves to importance more than Aggy?
Posted on 9/26/14 at 12:47 pm to sharkenleo
Posted on 9/26/14 at 12:47 pm to sharkenleo
They just don't look at the timeline.
In late 2008 ESPN signed a 15 year deal with the SEC that had NO NETWORK:
LINK
Now here we are in 2014 and the SEC has a network. What changed between now and then?
What changed was the SEC footprint grew by 50%.
Simply put, even with all their success in the field, without us the SEC would NOT be having success in the boardroom.
Heck given the low value of the CBS Tier 1 contract and that 2008 ESPN contract, it stands to reason that without us the ENTIRE SEC would make significantly less than the Big 10 this next decade.
You are welcome everyone.
In late 2008 ESPN signed a 15 year deal with the SEC that had NO NETWORK:
LINK
Now here we are in 2014 and the SEC has a network. What changed between now and then?
What changed was the SEC footprint grew by 50%.
Simply put, even with all their success in the field, without us the SEC would NOT be having success in the boardroom.
Heck given the low value of the CBS Tier 1 contract and that 2008 ESPN contract, it stands to reason that without us the ENTIRE SEC would make significantly less than the Big 10 this next decade.
You are welcome everyone.
This post was edited on 9/26/14 at 12:48 pm
1
Posted on 9/26/14 at 12:49 pm to cardboardboxer
quote:
Simply put, even with all their success in the field, without us the SEC would NOT be having success in the boardroom.
They really believe this.....
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News