Started By
Message

re: Is the West really THAT much better than the East?

Posted on 9/17/14 at 6:11 pm to
Posted by lilaznfish123
Arlington, VA
Member since Sep 2013
618 posts
Posted on 9/17/14 at 6:11 pm to
As an unbiased fan, YES the SEC West definitely looks much better than the SEC East. Arkansas would only lose to Georgia, SCAR, and maybe Mizzou from the east while Georgia/SCAR would beat Arkansas, State, maybe Ole Miss. I see Georgia/SCAR beating only one out of these four: Bama/Auburn/LSU/Tamu at the max.
Posted by ChaseMizzou
Member since Sep 2014
171 posts
Posted on 9/17/14 at 6:17 pm to
quote:

As an unbiased fan, YES the SEC West definitely looks much better than the SEC East. Arkansas would only lose to Georgia, SCAR, and maybe Mizzou from the east while Georgia/SCAR would beat Arkansas, State, maybe Ole Miss. I see Georgia/SCAR beating only one out of these four: Bama/Auburn/LSU/Tamu at the max.


So you're saying a team that barely beat West Virginia and a team that escaped Wisconsin and should have honestly lost has no chance to lose to the SC, Georgia or Mizzou.



Alright, buddy. As an unbiased SEC fan, put the kool-aid down. The West is all hype and no results thus far OUTSIDE of A&M.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter