Started By
Message

re: A question regarding perspective from the WV game.

Posted on 9/3/14 at 9:03 am to
Posted by elposter
Member since Dec 2010
24995 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 9:03 am to
OP, I think there is some truth to what you are saying. Sims looks like he can be a good game manager, but may struggle to push the ball down field if needed in a shootout.

If the defense is going to struggle to shut people down (which has a lot to do with how much the game has changed in the last couple of years - there are just more explosive offenses than ever before), then people feel like we might need more than the game manager type QB. Therefore, even though Sims did a good job, people are wondering if Coker has more upside because of his arm strength.

With a dominant defense, you can afford to go with the perceived "low risk, low reward" option at QB, which is what some think of Sims. With a defense that is going to give up points, you may want to roll the dice with a "high risk, high reward" option at QB which is what some think of Coker. I think the performance of the defense does impact people's views on the QB situation to some degree.
Posted by sarc
Member since Mar 2011
9997 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 9:26 am to
How bout we just fix the struggles on D instead of risking disrupting the O which played well?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter