quote:
That's true for Georgia too. Actually more so (except for the SC boys part). I'm going to go ahead and assume that your line with Clowney, Quarles, Taylor, Sutton, Ingram and co. was most likely more deep and talented than this one.

You know what that does right ... it makes an arse outta u and me.

What I think you may be failing to understand, and you're doing it honestly because you are not a fan of SCAR, is that in terms of pure talent, this year's line is by far our deepest and most talented.

More importantly, this year's line has something called chemistry. No big stars, just a lot of talent. No egos, just the motivation to prove to everyone that Clowney was not what made them tick.

This line is blowing-up our offense in practice. This line is mean from what I hear. This DLine is quiet, doesn't talk a lot, but just takes care of business on the field and in the weight room.

I do believe you're going to be in for a bit of a shock when you see it against your Dawgs in a month or so.

Better yet, watch the A&M game ... you'll get a preview of what I'm trying to explain and it might change your idea that y'all are going to walk in here and run over SCAR.

As good as Clowney was, he was a bit of a distraction last year. As good as Quarles was, he was not well liked by his teammates. As good as Sutton was, or could have been ... well, he never lived-up to the hype.

The year you're talking about, Ingram's last year, Clowney and Quarles were freshmen. We struggled inside at times, whereas this year we have a plethora of DT talent.

We'll just have to wait and see I suppose.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Crowknowsbest

Member since May 2012

25891 posts

Posted on 8/11/14 at 8:07 pm to scrooster

quote:
What I think you may be failing to understand, and you're doing it honestly because you are not a fan of SCAR, is that in terms of pure talent, this year's line is by far our deepest and most talented.

More importantly, this year's line has something called chemistry. No big stars, just a lot of talent. No egos, just the motivation to prove to everyone that Clowney was not what made them tick.

This line is blowing-up our offense in practice. This line is mean from what I hear. This DLine is quiet, doesn't talk a lot, but just takes care of business on the field and in the weight room.

I do believe you're going to be in for a bit of a shock when you see it against your Dawgs in a month or so.

Better yet, watch the A&M game ... you'll get a preview of what I'm trying to explain and it might change your idea that y'all are going to walk in here and run over SCAR.

As good as Clowney was, he was a bit of a distraction last year. As good as Quarles was, he was not well liked by his teammates. As good as Sutton was, or could have been ... well, he never lived-up to the hype.

The year you're talking about, Ingram's last year, Clowney and Quarles were freshmen. We struggled inside at times, whereas this year we have a plethora of DT talent.

You may be right, but this is standard fall camp sunshine-pumping practice report talk

Clowney is the most talented player in school history. That's most likely not replaced by chemistry, but you're right that I shouldn't assume, which is basically what I was just telling CIYE not to do.