To say OM only lost Moncreif is retarded. Not to mention the issue there isn't that OM has declined. It's just that State has likely improved more, seeing as we literally only lost like 3 starters. At least one of which we upgrade from. Not to mention finishing the season on a much higher note and, frankly, dominating you with no QB or effective offensive play for all but half a quarter. Unfortunately, we both have to deal with being at best on par with Bama/LSU/AU, even though it could be a down year for all 3.

As good as I feel about this season for State, I still have to consider AU, Bama, and LSU toss ups at best. However, likely losses is probably the safer bet until we see what cards everyone has.

This post was edited on 8/7/14 at 2:04 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by REBEL5 AC

Member since Sep 2012

14732 posts

Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:11 pm to skirpnasty

quote:
To say OM only lost Moncreif is retarded. Not to mention the issue there isn't that OM has declined. It's just that State has likely improved more, seeing as we literally only lost like 3 starters.

Wait. How can you say that and then that? Please name a true starter Ole Miss lost on offense or defense. Pierce Burton? Thank goodness.

You're out of your mind if you think MSU is a likely loss for Ole Miss. Y'all are setting yourselves up for major disappointment. Y'all were one OM injury from missing postseason last year. How does that add up to you guys being better than us?