Started By
Message
re: Most Entertaining Coach in the SEC
Posted on 7/12/14 at 2:17 pm to OSqueal
Posted on 7/12/14 at 2:17 pm to OSqueal
quote:
I read it, I just think his criteria is stupid.
Yep. What's the point of making an entertaining list of coaches and making wins part of the criteria? Win/loss has nothing to do with their entertainment. What a dolt.
1a OBC
1b Les
The rest.
Posted on 7/12/14 at 2:29 pm to chalupa
quote:
Yep. What's the point of making an entertaining list of coaches and making wins part of the criteria? Win/loss has nothing to do with their entertainment. What a dolt.
1a OBC
1b Les
The rest.
If he said team entertainment then used wins, coach personality and so then yea, but as far as entertaining coach wins shouldn't factor in as that's a team effort.
ETA: Misunderstood, took out unneeded substance.
This post was edited on 7/12/14 at 3:11 pm
Posted on 7/12/14 at 3:03 pm to chalupa
quote:
Yep. What's the point of making an entertaining list of coaches and making wins part of the criteria?
The losses are often times where the entertaining part comes into play...
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
This post was edited on 7/12/14 at 3:05 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)