re: A very honest and good article on Richt

quote:

---

That guy is a hack by the way. He's called for Richt's head several times now.

---

His first three paragraphs about Richt is a great man, better than me, blah blah, what a crock of shite.

If you actually believe Richt is a better man, and is superior to you in all things that actually matter, then how can you legitimately criticize a damn thing he's doing? Especially as it relates to football?

If it's a football piece, then don't even bring up the "great man" stuff. By bringing it up, and leading with it, you immediately discredit your opinion.

If you are writing a piece about public service, and you want to criticize Richt like "Instead of doing charity overseas, what about all the people who need help here at home" or some other shite, find and dandy.

Don't lead your story with three paragraphs about how Richt is a great man, right before you intentionally skew statistics to make him look like dog shite.

This is low class and the author is a piece of shite. He's also a bad writer. He clearly has no formal training in journalism.

Russ Mitchell is a poor journalist.

Whether or not he's right about Richt as a coach doesn't change the fact he's a bad writer.

I'm sure his editor hates him.