re: Does anyone actually believe this

So you think that the SECrant and wikipedia is what I will rely on to mold and make changes to my historical beliefs on God from a 5 page thread? If my opinion could be changed that easily I don't deserve to have one at all. I may be wrong, but it most likely will not be because of anything someone does or says on the Off Topic board.

And for the record, Roger Klarven was wrong in his exaggeration. He said "His passage referencing Jesus essentially admits that Jesus was the son if God" That just isn't so. Acknowledging Jesus existed in no way "admits that Jesus was the son of God." A ton of people believe Jesus existed who also think he was NOT the Son of God. The historian Josephus is no different.

For every book cited to your wikipedia copy and past, or your website, there is a book and website directly contrasting your point of view. It is what it is. By existing, I don't believe any of those authors and books mean you're wrong, nor do I believe someone's opinion being cited by wikipedia means I'm wrong. If you think it should convince me otherwise, I'm sorry.

And if u ain't mad, you sho do sound mad with the name calling stuff. Chill out, bro this isn't that big of a deal.