Started By
Message
re: UPDATE Dawgrant Playoff Committee (Dry-Run) RESULTS ARE IN
Posted on 6/30/14 at 9:55 pm to Jefferson Dawg
Posted on 6/30/14 at 9:55 pm to Jefferson Dawg
quote:
Apparently they do.
If votes count (which they don't) I'll be calling for a takeover campaign as the first order of business when the time comes
2
Posted on 6/30/14 at 9:58 pm to Chris_topher
By the way, I recalculated without Litigator's ballot counting double, and the top 4 is the same.
Based on the huge gap between 4 and 5, It wouldn't have mattered who's ballot counted double. Maybe Bama and Oklahoma swap positions but overall, not a big deal because 1 plays 4 anyway... right?
Based on the huge gap between 4 and 5, It wouldn't have mattered who's ballot counted double. Maybe Bama and Oklahoma swap positions but overall, not a big deal because 1 plays 4 anyway... right?
Posted on 6/30/14 at 10:03 pm to Chris_topher
I'm fine with taking away the vote on a ballot to eliminate and count double, less for me to calculate.
I've also decided a Top 8 is time consuming, I thought there'd be more parity, but the Top 4, this time around, was pretty clear. No reason to calculate all the outliers. I thought it would be closer.
Top 5 would probably be better for a ballot, publish the top 4. But because a #1 vote should still be weighted more heavily than a #3 or 4 or 5, we should still do inverse points.
I also don't know about the alternate idea. It adds another layer of calculation.
Unlike a pickum which can be even more of a task to calculate, this project will require a quick turnaround because we want this posted before the Comedy Czars in the media publish their's on a Tuesday, so you want all day Sunday to get in the ballots and Monday for Calculation.
Anyway, those are my initial thoughts after having just done this.
I've also decided a Top 8 is time consuming, I thought there'd be more parity, but the Top 4, this time around, was pretty clear. No reason to calculate all the outliers. I thought it would be closer.
Top 5 would probably be better for a ballot, publish the top 4. But because a #1 vote should still be weighted more heavily than a #3 or 4 or 5, we should still do inverse points.
I also don't know about the alternate idea. It adds another layer of calculation.
Unlike a pickum which can be even more of a task to calculate, this project will require a quick turnaround because we want this posted before the Comedy Czars in the media publish their's on a Tuesday, so you want all day Sunday to get in the ballots and Monday for Calculation.
Anyway, those are my initial thoughts after having just done this.
Page 1 of 1
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News