Louisville has had a solid offense through strongs tenure. Their offense doesn't need to be elite just effective. IMO strong has the largest alumni network in the nation, a huge booster and financial base, the best university in texas, some of the best athletic facilities in the nation and kids who grew up wanting to be a longhorn. Could be missing the point so someone tell me what does Baylor, TCU, SMU, Ags have over UT ? Other than being in different conferences

quote:
I think calling them a richer mans TCU is pretty biased

FIFY

This post was edited on 6/7/14 at 12:20 pm

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by CGSC Lobotomy

Member since Sep 2011

80789 posts

Posted on 6/7/14 at 12:27 pm to JimmyHDeridderhigh

Louisville also had Teddy Bridgewater. Texas has a QB who is one concussion away from never playing again.

A&M has almost as large of an alumni network which is more active, and BETTER facilities and are taking kids who grew up wanting to be longhorns.

This post was edited on 6/7/14 at 12:28 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by ColoradoElkHerd

USA

Member since May 2014

2313 posts

Posted on 6/7/14 at 1:50 pm to JimmyHDeridderhigh

quote:
Could be missing the point so someone tell me what does Baylor, TCU, SMU, Ags have over UT ? Other than being in different conferences

1. A&M already has the largest enrollment of any University in Texas and has plenty of real estate available for expansion. tu is landlocked in downtown Austin.

2. A&M will have a larger football stadium and better football facilities very shortly.

3. Donations to A&M were significantly larger than the donations to tu last year.

4. Sumlin's charima and the lure of playing SEC ball in Texas are a dynamite combination. Sumlin is taking recruits who grew up thinking they wanted to be Longhorns.

Anyone who thinks tu will ever dominate Texas recruiting again are wrong.