Started By
Message
re: Top 10 list for money spent on recruiting (2012-13)
Posted on 5/4/14 at 7:56 am to chattabama
Posted on 5/4/14 at 7:56 am to chattabama
quote:
I looked back at the 2013 class and noticed that Auburn had recruits from 9 states whereas Bama had recruits from 13 states. How does Auburn have a greater recruiting budget? I assume that the staffs are similar size. What gives?
I would think that a new staff would have to do more road work than an established staff with most of their board ranked. This is probably why Auburn and Tennessee were top 2.
Posted on 5/4/14 at 9:11 am to Warfarer
That's not really the case Tennessee historically has always been in the top 3 in money spent recruiting due to poor instate talent.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)