Started By
Message
re: Name That Prospect
Posted on 5/2/14 at 11:04 am to TTsTowel
Posted on 5/2/14 at 11:04 am to TTsTowel
quote:
I stopped reading here. Anything posted with Mel Kiper or Todd McShay deserves to be laughed at. Mike Mayock blows both of those clowns out of the water.
False statement is not only false, but laughable due to the fact that you think it's laughable that Mayock is superior given Kiper and McShay consistently out-perform him on draft day, showing not only a better penchant for talent placement, but also connections to the team.
quote:
We graded the 2012 Round 1 NFL mock drafts of Mel Kiper (ESPN), Todd McShay (ESPN), and Mike Mayock (NFL.com), and once again, McShay came out on top. This marks the fourth consecutive year in which McShay bested his two fellow pundits in mock draft accuracy.
We calculated a variability measure based on the difference between when each player was projected to be picked and when he was actually picked. A lower variability score is better (ranks in parentheses).
Mayock finished last in 3 of the past 5 years when comparing to those two and second in the other two.
LINK
Posted on 5/2/14 at 11:14 am to BamaDoc14
I see you left out the year 2013...
LINK (the newest and most updated link)
Mel Kiper: 9.6
Todd McShay: 10.6
LINK (the newest and most updated link)
quote:Mike Mayock: 9.1
Let’s start with our simple variability measure, which is based on the difference between when each player was projected to be picked and when he was actually picked. A lower variability score is better:
Mel Kiper: 9.6
Todd McShay: 10.6
quote:
The worst projection of all, however, was McShay pegging Ryan Nassib going #7 to Buffalo (actual: #110 to the Giants). This was by the far the worst first-round projection since we started tracking the mock drafts in 2008.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)