Started By
Message

re: Why is Auburn the only member of the "big 6" unable to sustain success?

Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:40 pm to
Posted by FlyDownTheField
Member since Dec 2013
1772 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

auburn has nothing :(


We have a recent natty in football, unlike UGA.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86624 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

We have a recent natty in football, unlike UGA.







4 short years ago we had exactly twice as many SEC titles as auburn. The thread is about "sustained success", as in, over a long period of time. Obviously auburn has been better the past several years. He's asking over the long haul.
Posted by Gus Bus Driver
Member since Feb 2014
495 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:46 pm to
We have sustained success in decades past, but recently its been a challenge. Coaching changes, offensive philosophy changes, and Gene Chizik. Add in the recent success of Arkansas, Alabama and LSU and there is your answer.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter