Started By
Message
re: Rhett Lashlee
Posted on 4/16/14 at 10:43 am to WG_Dawg
Posted on 4/16/14 at 10:43 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
Well, he's not exactly wrong. AU could have very easily lost 2 more games than they did and not won the SEC, or hell even the division.
That is true. On the other hand, Auburn could just as easily been NC's. That article was spot on. It's a fun style to watch. It's obviously very difficult to defend. It's here and SEC DC's are going to have to figure out a way to slow it down.
I heard all year that there was no way that one dimensional Auburn could stay with that vaunted bama run D. almsot 300 rushing yards later.....Mizzou's rush D is the second best in the SEC. 545 rushing yards later.......FSU definitely has the best D Auburn has faced. They also have a month to prepare for Auburn. 449 yards of O later........(the D is what cost Auburn the NC, not the O.)
This post was edited on 4/16/14 at 10:54 am
2
Posted on 4/16/14 at 10:54 am to MrAUTigers
quote:
That is true. On the other hand, Auburn could just as easily have been NC's.
Coulda, woulda, shoulda...isn't that what you guys keep yelling at us about our game with Bama 2 years ago? Funnyhow the same logic doesn't apply to you.
However, i a realize I am in the minority here, but I think Auburn's offense will be legit for years to come. they will be a handful for whoever they play. You made a huge turnaround very quickly. now it is up to everyone else to figure out how to stop you. Maybe we will...maybe we won't. Only time will tell.
Posted on 4/16/14 at 10:54 am to MrAUTigers
quote:Special teams cost the game, not the D.
.(the D is what cost Auburn the NC, not the O.)
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News