Started By
Message
re: Mizzou Admits They F*cked Up Sexual Assault Case of Student Athlete
Posted on 4/15/14 at 10:37 pm to kilo
Posted on 4/15/14 at 10:37 pm to kilo
quote:
But thats not how you entered this thread. You firmly implied that Anderson was told and lied about the contact between the two.
No matter how badly you want this to be on Mizzou and that they covered it up it isnt going to happen Grits. This song and dance is pathetic and now with the alter...come on.
I never said anything about a cover up by the University as a whole. I'm acknowledging the possibility that Anderson covered her own arse and the fact that her testimony contradicts the diary entry by a girl who committed suicide after being sexually assaulted.
On the one hand, you have two contemporaneous writings (Courey's diary entry and the therapist's notes) offering you proof that Courey reported the rape to Anderson.
On the other hand, you have Anderson's statement more than two years later, during an investigation concerning failure of one or more university employees to take proper action in response to a sexual assault report, that she does not recall being told about the rape.
If you were an unbiased, impartial observer asked to lend credence one way or the other (reported/not reported) which way would you lean? Which is the more probable scenario?
I get it, you are sensitive because there has been some bad news regarding Missouri in the last few days. This report isn't a vindication of Missouri. It is an indictment for failure to institute proper policies for handling/investigating a sexual assault at the very least, non-compliance with Title IX notwithstanding.
This post was edited on 4/15/14 at 10:45 pm
2
Posted on 4/15/14 at 11:14 pm to JDHLaw
quote:
I'm acknowledging the possibility that Anderson covered her own arse and the fact that her testimony contradicts the diary entry by a girl who committed suicide after being sexually assaulted.
And Anderson's testimony contradicts what she wrote in her diary. So you believe one and not the other, that really the gist of what you have been getting at through multiple posts all the while pointing fingers at Mizzou fans for being "biased". Hilarious.
Do you realize this woman attempted suicide two other times in completely unrelated situations to here alleged rape? She has a history of mental illness that neither herself or her parents thought "important" to inform the University of Missouri about prior to attending.
quote:
If you were an unbiased, impartial observer asked to lend credence one way or the other (reported/not reported) which way would you lean? Which is the more probable scenario?
You mean like the independent investigator who found "no definitive conclusion".
quote:
I get it, you are sensitive because there has been some bad news regarding Missouri in the last few days. This report isn't a vindication of Missouri. It is an indictment for failure to institute proper policies for handling/investigating a sexual assault at the very least, non-compliance with Title IX notwithstanding.
The only one in this thread drawing conclusions outside the scope of the report is you Grits. Everyone else seems to be taking the report at face value and accepting that there are procedural issues that need to be improved at Mizzou concerning reporting after the fact.
Posted on 4/15/14 at 11:40 pm to JDHLaw
Since you seem to be operating from the perspective that the therapist is a witness to the fact that Sasha told Anderson...
Directly from the report:
"Though the therapist did not have a recollection of Sasha Menu Courey telling her that she told the college counselor she was raped"
quote:
On the one hand, you have two contemporaneous writings (Courey's diary entry and the therapist's notes) offering you proof that Courey reported the rape to Anderson.
Directly from the report:
"Though the therapist did not have a recollection of Sasha Menu Courey telling her that she told the college counselor she was raped"
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News