Started By
Message
re: UNC Cheating Scandal
Posted on 3/28/14 at 11:31 am to adammwilson
Posted on 3/28/14 at 11:31 am to adammwilson
I'm still wondering how UNC managed to not only skate on the whole phantom department thing, but they've managed to keep their academic reputation in tact.
It's pretty amazing how they've managed this.
It's pretty amazing how they've managed this.
Posted on 3/28/14 at 11:48 am to ProjectP2294
quote:
The NCAA doesn't care about academics
this.
and none of this is going on in the SEC. Noooosirreee. When our guys eligibility is up if the don't go pro they will surely be curing cancer.
Posted on 3/28/14 at 11:51 am to ProjectP2294
quote:
I'm still wondering how UNC managed to not only skate on the whole phantom department thing, but they've managed to keep their academic reputation in tact. It's pretty amazing how they've managed this.
+1. They barely caught a glancing blow in the Butch Davis/Football deal. And you know what a "chosen one" status their Hoops program holds, so don't hold your breath waiting for anything that could come back on them.
Posted on 3/28/14 at 11:52 am to ProjectP2294
quote:yea, I don't see how they haven't come under investigation with possible loss of their accreditation
I'm still wondering how UNC managed to not only skate on the whole phantom department thing, but they've managed to keep their academic reputation in tact.
It's pretty amazing how they've managed this.
Posted on 3/28/14 at 11:56 am to ProjectP2294
quote:
I'm still wondering how UNC managed to not only skate on the whole phantom department thing, but they've managed to keep their academic reputation in tact.
The investigation is still ongoing and the consequences will be very severe. They are not even close to being out of the woods.
Posted on 3/28/14 at 11:57 am to ProjectP2294
quote:
I'm still wondering how UNC managed to not only skate on the whole phantom department thing, but they've managed to keep their academic reputation in tact.
It's pretty amazing how they've managed this.
Because pretty much everybody makes the distinction between "scholars" and "scholar-athletes." None of us expect our favorite team's players to be on the same level as the general population. We might brag about having XX number of Academic All-Americans, but we know, deep down, that usually just means the athlete in question manages to be just a bit above average (as opposed to one the country's elite when talking actual All-Americans) and probably taking a fairly easy course of study. There are exceptions, of course, but the general rule is solid enough that a university's athletic department and the general academic reputation are rarely going to be held to the same standards. I'm sure most Vandy players are bright enough, for instance, but I'm less sure most of them would have been solid takes for the university had they not brought athletic prowess to the table.
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News