re: UNC Cheating Scandal

I don't see the problem. He waxed prosaic with a compelling, almost-hypnotic narrative of courage, injustice, befuddlement, and, ultimately, a commentary on the moral calculus of authority.

Substitute any random SEC player's name for Rosa, and "crack house" for "bus" and you'd have a typical 30 page thread filled with earnest discussion, enraged recriminations, and endless trolling here on the Rant. If a paper could get that kind of reaction, wouldn't it seem fair to call it a rousing success?