Started By
Message

re: Blind test: Which QB would you rather have starting for your team next season?

Posted on 3/19/14 at 9:28 pm to
Posted by CockRocket
Columbia, SC
Member since May 2012
6840 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 9:28 pm to
quote:

I understand you want to pimp the new guys, but last year is one of the best DLs as a unit that SCAR has ever put on the field.
This isn't even close to true. 2010, '11, and '12 were all better, in every statistical category (rush D, TFL, Sacks) and our best year was probably 2011 with Ingram, Taylor, and Clowney.
Sutton was disappointing this year. He was supposed to take advantage of all the attention Clowney was getting. Well Quarles took that advantage.
quote:

You seem to be under the mistaken impression that SCAR just continually reloads which couldn't be further from the truth.
SC has never recruited with the likes of Bama, Georgia, LSU, Florida, etc. and we seem to be doing okay.
quote:

SCAR lost 3 of the 4 biggest talents on the DL
And the year before we lost our entire 2 deep at LB. Freshman stepped in and played well and Skai Moore was put on the All-American Freshman team.
quote:

He is EASILY the best player to ever take the field at SCAR, Rogers is the only other guy in the conversation.
Marcus Lattimore is definitely in the conversation and really so is Shaw. Obviously we haven't seen what USC will be like post-Shaw but we're doing okay in the RB department.
quote:

To tie this back in with the actual topic, who is Thompson going to be throwing to anyway? Beyond Roland, it is pretty scary with a tiny, quick guy coming off a knee injury, Cooper and Jones. Not likely to put the fear in opposing defenses. Just saying.
Well, we're only losing one WR, admittedly our best, Bruce but we return everyone else that actually got significant PT. Byrd, Roland, Jones, and Cooper (another freshman AA) will be a good group. We've heard this argument about losing a top WR 3 years in a row now, Alshon, Ace, and now Bruce. Not to mention we have a very good TE corp.
quote:

You honestly sound like a Georgia fan here pumping sunshine right now. Or like the Bama fans a couple of years ago that thought they'd easily replace that GOAT offensive line. Good luck with those expectations.
I sound just like anyone else that is excited for the next season to start and is excited about their teams' expectations. You sound like the standard rival fan that is repeating the same thing each offseason hoping once it will all be right.

Bottom line is we've gone through replacing whole position groups before and we do reload, whether you think so or not.

We only lose 3 players on O, returning 4/5 of the OLine, and a great stable of RBs. If Thompson struggles at all, he can just let Mike Davis take over the game.
Posted by wstorie44
Farmington
Member since Dec 2012
3193 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 9:52 pm to
You really cant go wrong with either Gurley or Davis both are fricking beast
Posted by Sarcastro
Member since May 2012
1383 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 9:52 pm to
Dylan's stats were the last two seasons. Mauk's was over this season, primarily his three starts and the 4th quarter against Georgia.

Dylan Thompson:

2012 stats: 1027 passing yards, 8.1 ypa, 52% completion percentage, 10 TDs, 2 INTs, 23 yards rushing, .068 rushing ypc, and 1 rushing TD

2013 stats: 783 passing yards, 8.8 ypa, 58.4% completion percentage, 4 TDs, 3 INTs, 27 rushing yards, 1.69 rushing ypc, and 3 rushing TDs

Maty Mauk 2013 stats:

1071 passing yards, 8.1 ypa, 51.1% completion percentage, 11 TDs, 2 INTs, 229 yards rushing, 5.59 rushing ypc, and 1 rushing TD

Mauk's stats last season are very comparable to Dylan in 2012, except that Dylan is a statue and Mauk is a dynamic runner. Also, in 2012 Dylan did most of his work against non-con opponents: 330 yards and 3 TDs against East Carolina, 177 yards and 3 TDs against UAB, 310 yards and 3 TDs against Clemson, and 117 yards and 2 TDs against Michigan. Overall, 934 of his 1027 passing yards and all eleven of his TDs were against non-con opponents in 2012.

Nearly all of Mauk's playing time and stats this year were when Franklin got hurt and Mauk started in his place: the fourth quarter of the Georgia game and the three SEC opponents afterwards.

Both are good QBs. Mauk is more dynamic and has a higher ceiling.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter