Started By
Message
re: moral equivalency? hunh vs flopping
Posted on 3/9/14 at 6:27 pm to bamamonty
Posted on 3/9/14 at 6:27 pm to bamamonty
quote:
To add an anti-flopping rule, is as bad as the 10 sec. rule that was just tabled. Who would decide who was flopping and who was not. Another judgement call added when not needed.
you aren't adding a rule, you are enforcing an already existing rule
2
Posted on 3/9/14 at 6:44 pm to molsusports
So, if flopping is against the rules, who will determine the legitimacy?
By suggesting in previous posts, that the flopping player(to be determined by who),must sit out an x number of downs. Why does this not need a rule change( the very thing that crowded this board with numerous crying and whining).
By suggesting in previous posts, that the flopping player(to be determined by who),must sit out an x number of downs. Why does this not need a rule change( the very thing that crowded this board with numerous crying and whining).
Posted on 3/9/14 at 7:14 pm to molsusports
quote:the current rule for a player following an injury timeout is that he is inelligible for the next play. Anything other than that would indeed be a rule change
you aren't adding a rule, you are enforcing an already existing rule
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News