Started By
Message
re: moral equivalency? hunh vs flopping
Posted on 3/8/14 at 4:14 pm to narddogg81
Posted on 3/8/14 at 4:14 pm to narddogg81
quote:
the question remains, how do you define flopping?
It's not my definition....it's YOURS. Once again, here is your quote:
quote:
but if its between having an exhausted defender that cant sub out or flopping, i say flop away. hunh and flopping are 2 sides of the same shitting coin in my opinion.
Posted on 3/8/14 at 4:32 pm to arrakis
quote:
It's not my definition....it's YOURS. Once again, here is your quote: quote: but if its between having an exhausted defender that cant sub out or flopping, i say flop away. hunh and flopping are 2 sides of the same shitting coin in my opinion.
quote:
So, you didn't post this or simply backtracking once you realized you posted bullshite? quote: i believe its more accurate to say flopping is against the ethics of the rules and hunh is against the spirit of the game, ie the game is the interaction between the play called on offense and the defensive play called to counter. what makes football great is that it operates on multiple levels. a stated goal of the hunh is to prevent ds from getting in plays, or at least the play the want. both are currently within the rules as they stand
In this instance exhaustion is the injury. should i link to heat exhaustion on web md? how about dehydration? are these injuries sufficient to stop play? the whole point is that 'feigning and illness' is pretty much impossible to define or detect, and is permissible under the current rules, if only for the fact that it cant be stopped without an additional rule change (ie player that leaves the field sits out a drive). its entirely subjective.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News