re: moral equivalency? hunh vs flopping

quote:

---

The counter argument against what argument?

---

in this thread particularly? the argument that refs should be in control of the pace of the game but only insofar as is consistent with them doing a proper job of officiating each play (ie being in position to see the play and not so exhausted that they miss calls they otherwise wouldn't, as well as the replay official having time to actually review a play before the next one begins, otherwise why have him). But since the hunh argument is really a series of arguments all woven together, apply the question more generally. do hunh proponents base their objections to any rule change (or ref procedure change) on concern for the integrity or spirit of the game, or because they think it will impact their team adversely?