Started By
Message

re: SEC Network, the thread

Posted on 4/19/14 at 4:39 pm to
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34342 posts
Posted on 4/19/14 at 4:39 pm to
That all seems very Keyser Söze of ESPN. I would believe the real answer is 50-50.

I don't think they saw the LHN pushing us to the SEC or the expansion of that league. They were really proud to keep the SEC away from a network with that 2009 deal.

I think the ESPN did come in back in 2010 with larger figures than originally considered to slow down realignment. I don't know if the LHN was meant to stabilize the Big 12 as much as ensure ESPN had control of one of the largest chess pieces on the board.

With the new SEC Network I think the realized they can't keep the SEC from having one (its a vanity thing now) so why not own it?
Posted by tmc94
Member since Sep 2012
11559 posts
Posted on 4/19/14 at 5:51 pm to
the SECN was agreed to in principle before we ever talked to Slive. Us going to the SEC was not part of ESPN's grand scheme. ESPN would have been perfectly happy if everyone stayed put.

As long as the sips are in the Big 12 for the life of that tier 1 contract and the Big 12 creates no network, their plan is a success. Our move is no more than a by-product of it all and probably fortuitous for them (though I think they had input) that we ended up in their league.
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
80415 posts
Posted on 4/19/14 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

I don't know if the LHN was meant to stabilize the Big 12 as much as ensure ESPN had control of one of the largest chess pieces on the board.


The longhorn network was meant to showcase Texas high school sports. They thought they could replicate the deal NBC had with Notre Dame while simultaneously skirting NCAA bylaws.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter