Yes, a healthy 2013 Georgia offense was tough to beat, but I'm not sure it was unstoppable.
Speaking of Georgia, how much greater was the 2013 Georgia offense compared to the 2012 version?
2012 Georgia had a good offense too, but they faced significantly better defenses in 2012 South Carolina, Florida, and Alabama.

quote:
27 points is not a ton. Especially when your offense turns over the ball 3 times.

Ole Miss had 500+ yards; they just weren't particularly efficient.
2009, 2010, 2012, and 2013 Ole Miss all had 400+ yards and 25+ points versus a Chavis defense.

quote:
LSU was held to under 50 rushing yards. Not going to win many games like that. Plus, they had 2 turnovers. Bama was held to under 400 yards of total offense.

I'm aware of this, and Alabama only scored a field goal off of the two turnovers. Alabama had the ball deep in LSU territory after stopping LSU on 4th down and had enough time to score another touchdown. I don't think many people here would state that Alabama's offense was better than Georgia's, yet they both performed similarly versus LSU several weeks apart.

quote:
While I can see where you're coming from I think the results overall speak for themselves. Chavis was given a young Defense and did very well with them all things considered.

That's debatable, but it's not big deal.
2010 Alabama only returned 2 starters and had to fight with injuries and complacency, yet they put up better numbers than 2013 LSU despite playing a tougher schedule.

This post was edited on 2/14/14 at 3:18 pm