Started By
Message
re: Bama and 5* Recruits
Posted on 2/6/14 at 9:53 am to CheeseburgerEddie
Posted on 2/6/14 at 9:53 am to CheeseburgerEddie
quote:
Thus they should not be counted for that sort of stat.
because it wont show what you want it to show. that is the problem. you are skewing the stat in your favor. How do you know they wouldnt have become a first rounder at another program? Their selection of school led them to be kicked out and not make it into the positive side of the stat.
1
Posted on 2/6/14 at 10:08 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
you are skewing the stat in your favor
Just as you are, I actually said lets look at all three stats.
quote:
Their selection of school led them to be kicked out
Precluded, did not necessarily lead. I stubbed my toe getting out of bed, then I found 5 dollars. Should I always stub my toe in order to find 5 dollars every morning?
quote:
How do you know they wouldnt have become a first rounder at another program
How do you know they would have?
You are playing these runaround games, I don't think you actually believe it either. Just look at all three stats and you can state whichever one is most important to you. And everyone else can form their own opinions. It seems most people are of the opinion that the truncated data set is a more applicable determination of a coach/programs ability to develop players. If you want to discuss ability to keep players out of off the field trouble, that is a different discussion.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News