Started By
Message

re: Question about some conference titles in football.

Posted on 1/22/14 at 9:47 pm to
Posted by Smalls
Southern California
Member since Jul 2009
10245 posts
Posted on 1/22/14 at 9:47 pm to
quote:

Just because a team is not in your conference, does not mean that wasn't a "conference" game. It was common practice to assign a non-conference opponent as a "conference game".


Does anyone else find this to be completely retarded?
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 1/22/14 at 9:48 pm to
He posts as kttfan on Rivals and is constantly pimping his site as "better" than others.
Posted by beachreb61
Long Beach, MS
Member since Nov 2009
1715 posts
Posted on 1/22/14 at 10:41 pm to
quote:

Posted by Smalls quote: Just because a team is not in your conference, does not mean that wasn't a "conference" game. It was common practice to assign a non-conference opponent as a "conference game". Does anyone else find this to be completely retarded?


Maybe retarded, but absolutely happened. Ole Miss was assigned Arkansas as a conference game a number of years. Didn't mean Arkansas was in the SEC at the time, just that they counted as a conference game for Ole Miss.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter