Started By
Message

re: How Would You Rank SEC Programs Historically?

Posted on 1/20/14 at 4:26 pm to
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
44253 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

Y'all are definitely ahead of us, but we do lead the series.


So? That doesn't change the fact that, historically, LSU is a better program than UF.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 4:28 pm to
quote:

So? That doesn't change the fact that, historically, LSU is a better program than UF.

Which I said in the first part of my post.
Posted by Edearl Watson
Parts Unknown
Member since May 2012
6782 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

So? That doesn't change the fact that, historically, LSU is a better program than UF.


No, it just says when we actually play on the field. UF is the better team. UF leads the series 31-26-3
Posted by UFownstSECsince1950
Member since Dec 2009
32611 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 4:34 pm to
quote:

So? That doesn't change the fact that, historically, LSU is a better program than UF
congrats on being better in the 40's

UF has been better when it counts, since expansion in 92.....you know, modern football without leather helmets

LSU would be #1 or #2 overall if Miles was somewhat competent and/or knew how to manage a clock.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter