Started By
Message
2
Posted on 1/20/14 at 5:13 pm to xgd
quote:
But why even let the TAMU trademarks be licensed at all?
So you can charge people when they try and market your shite... This is America, Bruh. It's not that big of a deal and although it may not seem like a lot of money, it's an added income for literally nothing. Capitalism, mayne. I'd be down for doing the same thing.
Posted on 1/20/14 at 5:23 pm to xgd
One of the reasons we licensed it to Seattle ... it set a precedent that we can use to enforce the trademark against anyone else in the future. The fact that somebody pays us a licensing fee is, in and of itself, evidence of a valid and enforceable trademark.
Bottom line: We didn't want to litigate it ... this time.
We originated the phrase. We own it. They stole it. They admitted it. They pay. All is good.
The Original 12th Man
Bottom line: We didn't want to litigate it ... this time.
We originated the phrase. We own it. They stole it. They admitted it. They pay. All is good.
The Original 12th Man
This post was edited on 1/20/14 at 5:29 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News