Started By
Message
re: Better running back: Tre Mason or Mark Ingram
Posted on 1/14/14 at 10:00 am to AuburnTigers
Posted on 1/14/14 at 10:00 am to AuburnTigers
Overlooking the fact that this is a pretty obvious troll post, I think it should be fairly easy to substantiate which back is better using actual statistics.
I'll make the case for Mason:
SEC RANK ALL-TIME: SINGLE SEASON
#1 Total Scoring (150)
#1 Rushing TDs (23)
#1 Total TDs (25)
#2 All-Purpose Yardage (2374)
#3 Total Rushing Yardage (1813)
#10 All-Purpose Yardage Per Game Avg (169.6)
#13 Rushing Yards Per Game Avg (129.7)
SEC RANK ALL-TIME: CAREER
#9 Rushing Yards per attempt (5.77)
These are all categories in which Mason finished above Ingram.
I'll make the case for Mason:
SEC RANK ALL-TIME: SINGLE SEASON
#1 Total Scoring (150)
#1 Rushing TDs (23)
#1 Total TDs (25)
#2 All-Purpose Yardage (2374)
#3 Total Rushing Yardage (1813)
#10 All-Purpose Yardage Per Game Avg (169.6)
#13 Rushing Yards Per Game Avg (129.7)
SEC RANK ALL-TIME: CAREER
#9 Rushing Yards per attempt (5.77)
These are all categories in which Mason finished above Ingram.
This post was edited on 1/14/14 at 10:02 am
2
Posted on 1/14/14 at 10:02 am to FearlessFreep
And no hardware to show for it. Silly argument.
Posted on 1/14/14 at 10:08 am to FearlessFreep
Ingram had more 10 more career rushing TDs as well as many more rushing yards. Also, Ingram had 60 rec for 4 Tds as opposed to Mason's 19 for 1 TD.
Ingram = complete back.
Put Ingram in Gus's run happy system and his stats only go up.
Ingram = complete back.
Put Ingram in Gus's run happy system and his stats only go up.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News