quote:
So, effectively University of Texas still controls A&M's OOC schedule by dictating who A&M is and isn't allowed to play? Sounds like UT is still A&M's Daddy too - so sad.

Good gosh almighty. I know you're trolling, but this was pathetic. If Baylor and TCU won't agree to a game, that makes Texas the Aggies' daddy? Really?

Personally I think there's enough bad blood with Baylor to nix that game for a long time, maybe longer than Texas. TCU... not so much. But honestly I don't see them as significantly better than Rice right now. Tech's KK has already said he'd be agreeable (with the proviso that JFF had moved on). That's good, I guess. I just hate to condemn Aggies to attending a game in Lubbock.

For the others: Rice is better than a lot of people here want to acknowledge, and SMU HAS been but had a bad year.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by thetruth2006

Dallas, TX

Member since Dec 2005

330 posts

Posted on 12/26/13 at 9:15 pm to finestfirst79

quote:
Good gosh almighty. I know you're trolling, but this was pathetic. If Baylor and TCU won't agree to a game, that makes Texas the Aggies' daddy? Really?

If as the prior A&M poster said, UT controls A&M's OOC schedule yet A&M has zero control over UT's anything - then yes, really. My point is NOT that the Aggie's OCC schedule is controlled by UT. But that was from the prior A&M poster which I'm ridiculing. If you think it sounds like BS too, take it up with the prior A&M poster who said so - not me.

3 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board