Started By
Message

re: The Heisman should go to McCarron

Posted on 12/12/13 at 2:42 pm to
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58943 posts
Posted on 12/12/13 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

Because he is reliable year in year out.



I understand what you are saying and how you feel, but if reliability was the only criteria, i would have won the Heisman. No, I didn't come close!

quote:

the guy has 2 nattys.


Were the Nattys won because of his efforts, or because of all the talent around him? In other words, would Alabama have won the Nattys without McCarron?

quote:

And just because Oregon lost 2 games doesn't necessarily mean their QB should be taken off the list imo


I agree, here. He should definitely still be in the running. The Heisman is an individual award, not a team award.

Don't misunderstand me...I like McCarron. He ran the offense very well. But I would not call him the best player in the country. I mean, using the Natty argument, you would also have to invite every Alabama player that played on those teams.
This post was edited on 12/12/13 at 2:44 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter