Started By
Message
re: OK boys the NEW YORK TIMES has vindicated Ol' Anti.
Posted on 12/4/13 at 6:29 am to allin2010
Posted on 12/4/13 at 6:29 am to allin2010
He was 5 yards downfield blocking as an eligible receiver during a pass attempt.
I have repeatedly cited the rule it was offensive pass interference.
NCAA Rule 7-3-8B. Also cited in the Times article.
I have repeatedly cited the rule it was offensive pass interference.
NCAA Rule 7-3-8B. Also cited in the Times article.
This post was edited on 12/4/13 at 6:31 am
2
Posted on 12/4/13 at 6:43 am to antibarner
He wasn't blocking he was trying to get open for a pass and Mosley was holding him. 
Posted on 12/4/13 at 12:54 pm to antibarner
quote:
He was 5 yards downfield blocking as an eligible receiver during a pass attempt.
I have repeatedly cited the rule it was offensive pass interference.
NCAA Rule 7-3-8B. Also cited in the Times article.
Mosely was nowhere near the ball or able to catch the ball, so no pass interference...To be pass interference you have to impede their ability to intercept or catch the ball.. There can be HOLDING, but that did not happen either.
Lets use an example that happens, two opposing players are on Bama sideline and the pass is thrown to the Auburn sideline. Have you EVER seen that called even once??? No because they were not impeding their ability to catch or intercept.
I know you are clinging for something, but the bottom line is this game will haunt you EVERY SECOND of your life....
HERE IS THE RULE
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News