Started By
Message
re: OK boys the NEW YORK TIMES has vindicated Ol' Anti.
Posted on 12/4/13 at 6:26 am to PuntBamaPunt
Posted on 12/4/13 at 6:26 am to PuntBamaPunt
So what was the penalty????? He was an eligible receiver, ineligible players can only block 3 yards down field.
Posted on 12/4/13 at 6:29 am to allin2010
He was 5 yards downfield blocking as an eligible receiver during a pass attempt.
I have repeatedly cited the rule it was offensive pass interference.
NCAA Rule 7-3-8B. Also cited in the Times article.
I have repeatedly cited the rule it was offensive pass interference.
NCAA Rule 7-3-8B. Also cited in the Times article.
This post was edited on 12/4/13 at 6:31 am
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)