Started By
Message

Mizzou-Tennessee thoughts
Posted on 11/6/13 at 10:15 am
Posted on 11/6/13 at 10:15 am
I know it is Wednesday and we are all thinking about Kentucky and what lies ahead, but I re-watched the game last night and had a few thoughts to share.
Mizzou did a great job of taking 2nd and long situations and either converting them or making it 3rd and short. I counted about 15 times we were in 2nd and long, but we ended up with only 5-7 3rd and long situations. Optimally, fewer 2nd and long situations are better, but making positive yards so frequently is a testament to how good our offensive line is playing.
The defense didn't get a ton of pressure on the Tennessee quarterback, but when they did get pressure they made it count by forcing turnovers and incompletions. Also, the defense held in 2nd and long situations, forcing over 3/4 of their 2nd and long plays into 3rd and long.
I continue to be amazed at how well our running back by committee approach is working. We are deep at the position, and I could see this working for years to come. It requires backs that don’t mind not being featured, and allows for the hot hand to get the ball. It would seem that is also makes us more difficult to game plan against, since all backs do all things: running, blocking, and receiving.
We didn't have as many dropped passes as I thought, but if we catch all of the balls that are catchable, Mauk is at 56% completion rate for the game, which is acceptable considering he is a freshman starting his 3rd game.
Mauk’s improvement was noticeable. He did a great job of running up the middle as the pocket collapsed rather than feeling pressure and trying to roll to the side. He only got flushed from the pocket a few times to the outside and was able to make modest gains or throw it away on those. His pocket presence appears to be improved from the South Carolina game.
Tennessee made costly mistakes at key points in the game. They had penalties and turnovers kill drives and lead directly to easy points for Mizzou. Had this not been the case, the field position game could have been an issue. They did a great job of pinning us in our end of the field, and had much better starting position throughout the game. They did a great job playing for field position, especially in the second half. Unfortunately for Tennessee, they could not move the ball or get into any sort of rhythm on offense. I counted one trip inside the 30. On this one trip, they turned it over on downs after 2 penalties and honestly the game was already decided at that point. We held them to 9 yards in Mizzou territory for much of the first 3 quarters and had it not been for a 51 yard field goal we would have shut them out.
This was about as complete a game as we have played with Mauk as quarterback, and should speak to what we can expect as the regular season comes to a close and hopefully next year as Mauk matures.
Mizzou did a great job of taking 2nd and long situations and either converting them or making it 3rd and short. I counted about 15 times we were in 2nd and long, but we ended up with only 5-7 3rd and long situations. Optimally, fewer 2nd and long situations are better, but making positive yards so frequently is a testament to how good our offensive line is playing.
The defense didn't get a ton of pressure on the Tennessee quarterback, but when they did get pressure they made it count by forcing turnovers and incompletions. Also, the defense held in 2nd and long situations, forcing over 3/4 of their 2nd and long plays into 3rd and long.
I continue to be amazed at how well our running back by committee approach is working. We are deep at the position, and I could see this working for years to come. It requires backs that don’t mind not being featured, and allows for the hot hand to get the ball. It would seem that is also makes us more difficult to game plan against, since all backs do all things: running, blocking, and receiving.
We didn't have as many dropped passes as I thought, but if we catch all of the balls that are catchable, Mauk is at 56% completion rate for the game, which is acceptable considering he is a freshman starting his 3rd game.
Mauk’s improvement was noticeable. He did a great job of running up the middle as the pocket collapsed rather than feeling pressure and trying to roll to the side. He only got flushed from the pocket a few times to the outside and was able to make modest gains or throw it away on those. His pocket presence appears to be improved from the South Carolina game.
Tennessee made costly mistakes at key points in the game. They had penalties and turnovers kill drives and lead directly to easy points for Mizzou. Had this not been the case, the field position game could have been an issue. They did a great job of pinning us in our end of the field, and had much better starting position throughout the game. They did a great job playing for field position, especially in the second half. Unfortunately for Tennessee, they could not move the ball or get into any sort of rhythm on offense. I counted one trip inside the 30. On this one trip, they turned it over on downs after 2 penalties and honestly the game was already decided at that point. We held them to 9 yards in Mizzou territory for much of the first 3 quarters and had it not been for a 51 yard field goal we would have shut them out.
This was about as complete a game as we have played with Mauk as quarterback, and should speak to what we can expect as the regular season comes to a close and hopefully next year as Mauk matures.
Posted on 11/6/13 at 11:14 am to phergy
All good thoughts. Another thing that really struck me is how well we played ball control in the 2nd half. Had Pinkel not moved into that approach, we would have continued to score at will. Instead, if i counted right, we only threw the ball 5 times in the 2nd half. We ran the ball, and played contain defense, and it worked well.
I also appreciate the fact that Pinkel doesn't like to embarrass anyone, and isn't about scoring just for style points. I also noticed he had a prolonged exchange with Butch Jones after the game - more than just the "good game" and a handshake standard. My guess is he was complimentary and told him to keep doing what he was doing and they'd keep getting better. Certainly a classier exchange than others I've seen.
Now, given, it was a freshman QB in his first start, and Tennessee isn't quite there yet, but if our defense can perform like that, we can play with anyone.
I also appreciate the fact that Pinkel doesn't like to embarrass anyone, and isn't about scoring just for style points. I also noticed he had a prolonged exchange with Butch Jones after the game - more than just the "good game" and a handshake standard. My guess is he was complimentary and told him to keep doing what he was doing and they'd keep getting better. Certainly a classier exchange than others I've seen.
Now, given, it was a freshman QB in his first start, and Tennessee isn't quite there yet, but if our defense can perform like that, we can play with anyone.
Posted on 11/6/13 at 12:54 pm to semotruman
quote:
Another thing that really struck me is how well we played ball control in the 2nd half.
Correct, and also a valuable ability to have. Would have been nice if we could have done that against South Carolina.
quote:
we only threw the ball 5 times in the 2nd half.
Also an important stat. We didn't have to throw so we didn't. We ran, Tennessee knew we were running, and we still picked up first downs frequently enough to control the clock.
quote:
I also noticed he had a prolonged exchange with Butch Jones after the game - more than just the "good game" and a handshake standard.
I would love to have heard that conversation.
quote:
Now, given, it was a freshman QB in his first start, and Tennessee isn't quite there yet
I would put an emphasis on Tennessee not quite being there yet. Their freshman QB did pretty good, all things considered. Tennessee could be really good in the years to come. I don't expect it to take too long for them to return to prominence, which is amusing considering how Dooley did there.
Posted on 11/6/13 at 5:30 pm to phergy
Great thoughts and evaluations.
One troubling item (over multiple games now) is how opposing WRs are consistently getting open down field. The only thing preventing us from being exposed is the complete inaccuracy of these back-up quarterbacks.
With the exception of the Conner Shaw quarter and a half, we have faced a series of compromised offenses - so call me concerned.
One troubling item (over multiple games now) is how opposing WRs are consistently getting open down field. The only thing preventing us from being exposed is the complete inaccuracy of these back-up quarterbacks.
With the exception of the Conner Shaw quarter and a half, we have faced a series of compromised offenses - so call me concerned.
Posted on 11/7/13 at 8:53 am to Mizz-SEC
quote:
One troubling item (over multiple games now) is how opposing WRs are consistently getting open down field
Very good point, and something to watch.
Posted on 11/7/13 at 9:00 am to Mizz-SEC
I agree. I can't tell you how many times this season when the other has thrown the ball I've said "Oh shite. He's wide open" quickly followed up with "Thank god their QB sucks." To Mizzou's credit, part of the reason for the errant passes could be the pressure our ends are bringing on the QB.
Good write up in the OP too.
Good write up in the OP too.

Posted on 11/7/13 at 9:13 am to phergy
Hard to gauge and comment when Tennessee looked sooooooooooo bad.
This week could be just same song second verse. Ole Miss should be a good test though. It think we get out of there with a win by the skin of our teeth.
This week could be just same song second verse. Ole Miss should be a good test though. It think we get out of there with a win by the skin of our teeth.
Posted on 11/7/13 at 10:10 am to reedus23
The WR getting open downfield is my biggest concern against A&M. That could be ugly. At least they don't have a defense. Track Meet! Last one with the ball wins?
Posted on 11/7/13 at 10:20 am to phergy
quote:
quote:
One troubling item (over multiple games now) is how opposing WRs are consistently getting open down field
Very good point, and something to watch.
Something that MUST change before A&M and possibly the SECCG
Posted on 11/7/13 at 11:37 am to mizzou18
The WR being wide open in the middle of the field is a feature of the 2 deep zone defense to some extent. Mizzou did a good job against Georgia and Andy Murray. It seems they give up that over the middle pass primarily when they are trying to avoid the big play over the top. The problem is that they are giving up the big play underneath.
Popular
Back to top
