re: Best RB in the SEC after week 7

quote:

---

How is this irrelevant? Missing games meaning what? That therefore Davis has about 10 more carries than Hill has? That has any relevancy? Davis hasn't missed entire games because unlike Hill he doesn't get into trouble within his program, but he has been taken out of games for substantial portions of times this season.

How can an argument for a RB being the best in the SEC be based on how much said RB is a non-factor due to him not being used in games? Shouldn't that be a basis on how said RB is NOT the best?? Because he's not on the field of play, he's standing on the sideline in his civvies?

---