Started By
Message

re: I think its safe to say TAMU/MIZ bring more value to tSEC than Arky.

Posted on 10/5/13 at 12:16 pm to
Posted by wmr
North of Dickson, South of Herman's
Member since Mar 2009
32518 posts
Posted on 10/5/13 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

Absolutely. In 1992 we didn't go after Arky. We were supposed to get tamu. Legislation blocked acquisition of tamu. We got leftovers.


Actually the SEC went after Texas and Arkansas in 1990.

The SEC didn't get Texas because Texas A&M attached themselves to Texas, Baylor-style.

But that's just what Harvey Schiller, SEC Commissioner at the time, says.

LINK
This post was edited on 10/5/13 at 12:18 pm
Posted by Mizz-SEC
Inbred Huntin' In The SEC
Member since Jun 2013
19283 posts
Posted on 10/5/13 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

Actually the SEC went after Texas and Arkansas in 1990.

The SEC didn't get Texas because Texas A&M attached themselves to Texas, Baylor-style.

But that's just what Harvey Schiller, SEC Commissioner at the time, says.

LINK




Funny how these things work out. TAMU lawyered the system. Kept Tex out. And are now the Razorback's daddy.

And the lesser one will become the greater...
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter