Started By
Message

re: Missouri's future vs. Tennessee's future.

Posted on 10/1/13 at 5:43 pm to
Posted by Stephen A. Burroughs
I'm not a rapper
Member since Jun 2013
936 posts
Posted on 10/1/13 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

an astronomically better recruiting class


fyp

btw I like you guys, but we should've added WVU instead.
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 10/1/13 at 5:45 pm to
quote:


btw I like you guys, but we should've added WVU instead.



Can you explain why?

WVU has an inferior state. Inferior school. Inferior market. Extremely comparable football programs. MU better overall athletic department.

There are good reasons why the smart guys making the decisions at the SEC made the one they did.
Posted by TigerMattSTL
O'Fallon, MO
Member since Aug 2011
1105 posts
Posted on 10/2/13 at 2:19 am to
quote:

btw I like you guys, but we should've added WVU instead.


Business sense like that is why you will never advance past flipping burgers at McDonalds.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter