Started By
Message
re: Twitter blowing up abuot DJ Fluker in Yahoo Sports investigation...
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:11 am to S.E.C. Crazy
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:11 am to S.E.C. Crazy
49 itemized expenditures were revealed to Robinson via captured “ EMAIIL ”
Reading law online : If a person intercepts someones EMAIL and * discloses * that information , he or she can face a 5 year prison sentence for the crime.
C.R. should know better than to read a persons private EMAIL , and if pressed in a court of law will have to give up the criminal informant.
C.R. released private information from a private EMAIL and could be both criminally and litigiously libel.
Something to chew on , hope the shyt stirrer who is no doubt doing the bidding of some nefarious ,low life POS that has ulterior motives against Bama gets his comeupance.
Reading law online : If a person intercepts someones EMAIL and * discloses * that information , he or she can face a 5 year prison sentence for the crime.
C.R. should know better than to read a persons private EMAIL , and if pressed in a court of law will have to give up the criminal informant.
C.R. released private information from a private EMAIL and could be both criminally and litigiously libel.
Something to chew on , hope the shyt stirrer who is no doubt doing the bidding of some nefarious ,low life POS that has ulterior motives against Bama gets his comeupance.
2
Posted on 9/12/13 at 7:29 am to S.E.C. Crazy
I hope and think the ncaa knows this chit happens every day. What they expect is that the Universities are serious about compliance and regularly tutor the players on the do's and dont's. If the universities have done all they can do and they did not cover up or lie like in the case of OSU and Oregon, then I am hoping the former players can't harm the University. Now if it was a current player then he is unable to play going forward.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 9:00 am to S.E.C. Crazy
quote:
If a person intercepts someones EMAIL and * discloses * that information , he or she can face a 5 year prison sentence for the crime.
So the Emails were intended for someone else and CR intercepted them?
quote:
C.R. should know better than to read a persons private EMAIL , and if pressed in a court of law will have to give up the criminal informant.
What if the person who the emails were intended for shared with CR?
quote:
C.R. released private information from a private EMAIL and could be both criminally and litigiously libel.
Did I miss an article where someone stepped up and made the claim that the emails were *stolen* and CR did not have permission to release the messages?
Page 1 of 1
Latest Alabama News
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News