Started By
Message
re: Power Rankings thread? Yep, it's time.
Posted on 9/2/13 at 9:22 pm to genro
Posted on 9/2/13 at 9:22 pm to genro
Taking all with a grain of salt because of the wide difference of opponents... and it's only 1 game:
- UF too low. Too good of a D to be that low.
- only 1 issue "found" with Bama, and they are fixable (not talent related)
- Watched the USC game, I would agree. Appears to be a complete team.
- TCU just might be an avg Bevo 12 team. Lets see if O is consistent. Can't argue any placement between 3 & 5 after Sat.
- For the same reason UF should be higher, TAMU should be lower (lack of D). But, had starters out; not sure what their D really looks like yet.
- UF too low. Too good of a D to be that low.
- only 1 issue "found" with Bama, and they are fixable (not talent related)
- Watched the USC game, I would agree. Appears to be a complete team.
- TCU just might be an avg Bevo 12 team. Lets see if O is consistent. Can't argue any placement between 3 & 5 after Sat.
- For the same reason UF should be higher, TAMU should be lower (lack of D). But, had starters out; not sure what their D really looks like yet.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)