Started By
Message
re: Mizzou Has Been Referred to as a Sleeping Giant in Football
Posted on 8/9/13 at 7:06 pm to DawgHolliday
Posted on 8/9/13 at 7:06 pm to DawgHolliday
It's not a huge difference but SCar is wayyyyy more new school. They were like .470 when spurrier took over and they didn't even win their first bowl game til '94. Not to mention the whole "11 win season" rings.. 
1
Posted on 8/9/13 at 7:13 pm to KCM0Tiger
Playing Devils Advocate here...what was Mizzous win percentage when Pinkel took over? .500 or so? Maybe slightly higher?
Again, not trying to insult, just pointing out the parallels. The past decade has been the most successful for both schools outside of possibly the Dan Devine days at Mizzou.
Again, not trying to insult, just pointing out the parallels. The past decade has been the most successful for both schools outside of possibly the Dan Devine days at Mizzou.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News