Started By
Message

Court says Yall can't use USC
Posted on 8/7/13 at 8:12 pm
Posted on 8/7/13 at 8:12 pm
LINK
....
From JimDawginTx from the Dawgrant..
....
From JimDawginTx from the Dawgrant..
quote:
DEF points us to a recent appeals court (federal circuit) ruling that held that the University of South Carolina cannot use the letters USC on its sports uniforms because the University of Southern California already claims those letters. Seriously. It's hard to see how this makes much sense at all. USC is an accurate acronym for both schools, and it makes no sense to limit it. In an amazingly obnoxious gloating victory note, the lawyer for the USC from California "suggested that the letters were more deservedly linked to the Trojans' warrior image than to 'a goofy little chicken,'" by which he meant the logo of the South Carolina teams. The lawyer for the USC from the east coast noted that "Southern manners" kept him from responding to that point.
This post was edited on 8/7/13 at 8:13 pm
Posted on 8/7/13 at 8:17 pm to deeprig9
From 2010, really?!?!
Did y'all just get the interwebz?
Did y'all just get the interwebz?
Posted on 8/7/13 at 8:54 pm to deeprig9
Tell me, what do you hear?frick So.Cal.
Posted on 8/7/13 at 9:07 pm to CockRocket
Gay disco rave hypno music?
Sorry, trying out my Jefferson Dawg impression.
ONward....Gowder.
Sorry, trying out my Jefferson Dawg impression.
ONward....Gowder.
This post was edited on 8/7/13 at 9:09 pm
Posted on 8/7/13 at 9:25 pm to RFDAWG
quote:
Sorry, trying out my Jefferson Dawg impression.
ONward....Gowder.
Needs more ellipses..............................
Posted on 8/7/13 at 9:28 pm to deeprig9
I didn't realize this was old news, sorry for stinking up your board. I thought it was late breaking from the west coast 9th circuit. I apologize.
Posted on 8/7/13 at 9:30 pm to deeprig9
quote:
I didn't realize this was old news, sorry for stinking up your board. I thought it was late breaking from the west coast 9th circuit. I apologize.
Maybe next time read what any old idiot puts up on Dawgrant before parroting it over here?
Posted on 8/7/13 at 9:40 pm to deeprig9
Interesting deflection attempt on behalf of the Gypsy
Posted on 8/7/13 at 9:46 pm to deeprig9
The 9th circuit court also said we couldn't use the interlocking SC on our hats..... nothing happened.
Posted on 8/7/13 at 9:48 pm to Loathor
quote:
Maybe next time read what any old idiot puts up on Dawgrant before parroting it over here?
I'm running in an election over there and he asked someone with access to post it over here so I did, I am a shallow man. If I knew it was old news I wouldn't have done it.
ETA- I get the impression JimDawg is on yall's side in this... so step off the gas a little. This is us vs them... the california folk.
This post was edited on 8/7/13 at 9:49 pm
Posted on 8/7/13 at 9:51 pm to Cockopotamus
In other breaking court verdicts you might have missed...
Abortions are now legal...
Black people actually count as people...
Ditto for companies...
And voters in Florida can not be counted on to reliably choose a President...
Abortions are now legal...
Black people actually count as people...
Ditto for companies...
And voters in Florida can not be counted on to reliably choose a President...
Popular
Back to top

6








