Started By
Message
re: Exposing ESPN
Posted on 8/5/13 at 11:02 am to AUtigerNOLA
Posted on 8/5/13 at 11:02 am to AUtigerNOLA
quote:
quote:
I don't believe Au ever offered the cash, Au got lucky that the cash plan was getting exposed which forced Can to not be able to go to MSU it he would have most definitely been ineligible.
Agreed.
I think this is pretty likely as well.
As for the current JFF thing, it is relevant to include the Ttown menswear situation in the discussion as the same rules are in question. Namely, did a player sign memoribilia for compensation.
1
Posted on 8/5/13 at 11:16 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
As for the current JFF thing, it is relevant to include the Ttown menswear situation in the discussion as the same rules are in question. Namely, did a player sign memoribilia for compensation.
No they're similar but not the same. there was NO witness or witnesses that claimed the Bama players got paid or asked for compensation (plenty if Au fans made the leap of guilt). Not one person claimed the Bama players set up a deal to sign for cash. The Bama players signed at a business that in the past put on university sponsored signing sessions and is where the team gets there game day apparel.
JFF has witnesses claiming that they were apart of the deal and gave specific details of the transaction.
Clearly you should be able to see the difference. One has only allegations by the bitterest of rivals while the other has claims from actually witnesses to the tranactions .
I do see the similarity : they both deal with players signing memorabilia.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News