Started By
Message

re: Exposing ESPN

Posted on 8/5/13 at 10:56 am to
Posted by Govt Tide
Member since Nov 2009
9140 posts
Posted on 8/5/13 at 10:56 am to
You missing the point. I never said there was proof that Cam's dad received anything. He admitted to shopping his son which is against the rules. There was an admission of wrongdoing (however minor) on Cecil Newton's part. In Ttown's Menswear, there was no documented violation or admission of a violation anywhere. Granted, it looks fishy but looking fishy doesn't equal rules violation. It "looks" fishy when Dakota Mosley and Dee Liner are on twitter fanning out cash but stuff like that by itself isn't a rules violation.
Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 8/5/13 at 11:08 am to
quote:

You missing the point. I never said there was proof that Cam's dad received anything. He admitted to shopping his son which is against the rules. There was an admission of wrongdoing (however minor) on Cecil Newton's part. In Ttown's Menswear, there was no documented violation or admission of a violation anywhere. Granted, it looks fishy but looking fishy doesn't equal rules violation. It "looks" fishy when Dakota Mosley and Dee Liner are on twitter fanning out cash but stuff like that by itself isn't a rules violation


If you lived in Alabama during that time you saw tons of autographed items by some of the named players at any mall or tradeshow. Tom From T-town was the broker for all those items. Unless you think those player spent hours signing their names for free because they justed love Tom, you would have to think it was beyond fishy.
This post was edited on 8/5/13 at 11:09 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter