Started By
Message
re: PP7 still mad, pals. Oh he still real mad......
Posted on 7/24/13 at 3:35 pm to Bmath
Posted on 7/24/13 at 3:35 pm to Bmath
Bama still won the game and eventually the NC. I don't see why they have such a hard time admitting it was a bad call. It's not like it'll make you a bad person or any less of a Bama fan to admit so.
4
Posted on 7/24/13 at 3:37 pm to GCTiger11
quote:Do you think we really have a hard time admitting that? I sure don't, but this is comedy gold my man..
I don't see why they have such a hard time admitting it was a bad call.
Posted on 7/24/13 at 3:38 pm to GCTiger11
quote:
Bama still won the game and eventually the NC. I don't see why they have such a hard time admitting it was a bad call. It's not like it'll make you a bad person or any less of a Bama fan to admit so.
I have fully admitted is was very likely an INT. What I dispute is the idea that there was an SEC conspiracy and that photographs can prove possession. If it had been ruled an INT on the field, there is no doubt it would have been confirmed on replay. The "indisputable evidence" burden of proof is what fricked LSU, not the Illuminati.
Posted on 7/24/13 at 3:38 pm to GCTiger11
Well technically the replay call was correct since by the rules they have to have DEFINITE evidence to overturn the call on the field. But I admit the call on the field was wrong.
Posted on 7/24/13 at 4:10 pm to GCTiger11
quote:
Bama still won the game and eventually the NC. I don't see why they have such a hard time admitting it was a bad call. It's not like it'll make you a bad person or any less of a Bama fan to admit so.
That time the ref tackled the scar player, that was totally legit.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News