re: When you think of tradition which SEC teams immediately come to mind

quote:

---

Someone sure is touchy this morning.

---

Not really, just responding in kind to the "liar" comment.

quote:

---

Maybe you should try looking at multiple sources since you already included the "stassen was missing 1901 game" line in your previous post. They missed one, it's just as easy for them to miss another.

---

maybe if someone is disagreeing with my information, they should just provide an alternate citation up front. then I wouldn't have to try to go back and see what data my source was missing.

quote:

---

Okay bud. Since this is so hard for you to comprehend without the use of stassen.

---

It's not hard at all, I used a source, someone said I was lying and didn't provide any other information. I would expect that if someone didn't like my source, they would provide another - they didn't.

quote:

---

3 of the first 6 results had the all-time record without missing games. Who knew searching the interwebz was so fricking difficult?

---

Whatever. I did a search, came up with bad data, then was called out on it and all I did was try to get them to provide another source. Why is that such a big deal to you? I'm not really motivated to find sources to prove my original data wrong - why would I be?

Back to the bigger picture, which I assume all of this bullshite was designed to avoid, LSU has ruled Auburn for most of football history, and some trivial point about, "But Auburn led 5 games to 4 back in the 1920s!!!!1!" is really supposed to deflate my point of how much superior to Auburn LSU has been over time?



I mean, Auburn fans are going to cling to that 5-4 series lead in 1927 as some evidence that Auburn has a historically superior football tradition than LSU? Really?

No wonder Alabama fans can't stand Auburn fans, they're just ridiculously silly.

BTW, how can I be certain that the sites you provided don't contain any errors?