Started By
Message
re: 2012 revenues per USA Today
Posted on 5/8/13 at 11:55 am to NYCAuburn
Posted on 5/8/13 at 11:55 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
FWIW, received 5.4 mil, donated back 4.4 mil. But again, it's accounting math as for what that original 5.4 mil came from and what it was for
I looked at the numbers. It is a 1 million for faculty and 3 million for licensing. The USA Today said nothing of the millions Alabama athletics puts into the general scholarship fund, or for facility improvements University wide.
1
Posted on 5/8/13 at 12:40 pm to CapstoneGrad06
If nothing else, it clearly shows the haves and the have nots. Only a small % subsidize less than 5% of the AD. There are several in the 5-10 range and then after 50 or schools in total the numbers fall off a cliff and the other 75%, including some BCS schools and 60+ FBS subsidize more than 25% of their program let alone profit.
Looks like there is an Elite 15 or so in earnings, a "big-time program" area fro 16-50 and then the trash left over.
Makes Saban's idea of a class 1 FBS division make a lot of sense. These are businesses with vastly different models.
Looks like there is an Elite 15 or so in earnings, a "big-time program" area fro 16-50 and then the trash left over.
Makes Saban's idea of a class 1 FBS division make a lot of sense. These are businesses with vastly different models.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News